INDIA AGAINST 498a by Bijay Singh

Y ou have been fabricated falsely in dowry cases in packages of 498a to ruin your life. Its a  strategy  to extort money only. It is advisable to read the FIR copy and make points where the opposite party is making mistakes. The irony is 90% of the writing in FIR is copy paste so there are chances that you will find a lot of loopholes that will backfire the opposite party, here opposite party is putting only allegations which are baseless so you have to attack on that. Keep patience and wait for the right time. Lets see the counter cases you can impose on the opposite party . CHAPTER XI: OF FALSE EVIDENCE AND OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE   191.       Giving false evidence   Whoever, being legally bound by an oath or by an express provision of law to state the truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe...

  The Supreme Court issues a slew of directions on determining quantum of Maintenance in Matrimonial cases The Supreme Court in a significant judgment in the case of Rajnesh vs Neha issued a slew of directions for payment of interim maintenance and the criteria to be followed in determining the quantum of maintenance in matrimonial cases. It also issued guidelines to be adhered to by family courts, district courts and magistrate courts across the country to overcome the issue of overlapping jurisdiction and avoid conflicting orders being passed in different proceedings. Facts of the Case: The Respondent (wife) left the matrimonial home, shortly after the birth of the son. The wife then filed an application for interim maintenance u/S. 125 Cr.P.C. on behalf of herself and the minor son. The Family Court vide a detailed Order awarded interim maintenance of Rs.15,000 per month to the wife and Rs.5,000 per month as interim maintenance for the son from 01.09.2013 to 31.08.2015 and Rs. 1...

 Supreme Court has given verdict in DV where it states that without investigation and solid evidences the court cant  Dv act me issue notice to the accused. If the facts are found false then the complainant should be punished and to be prosecuted with the terms in Jail. Read the judgement.  ये फैसला सुप्रीमकोर्ट का है DV 12  बिना जांच किये और बिना सबूतों के पाये बिना अब लोअर कोर्ट नोटिस नहीं दे सकती  और जांच में पाये गए सबूत गलत साबित हुए तो पत्नी और उसके परिवार वालों को जेल होगी ! Supreme Court of India Shyamlal Devda vs Parimala on 22 January, 2020 Author: R. Banumathi Bench: R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION   CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2020       REPORTABLE (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.4979 of 2019) SHYAMLAL DEVDA AND OTHERS              ...