Skip to main content

Some Judgements where Maintenance denied to wives.. Refrence to read

 Here are some very important judgments where the greedy wife has been denied for the Maintenance by the court. You can read to find yourself be ready for the fighting the cases if you have. It will help for your case and to make strategy to prepare yourself.

(यहां कुछ बहुत ही महत्वपूर्ण निर्णय दिए गए हैं जहां लालची पत्नी को अदालत द्वारा रखरखाव के लिए मना कर दिया गया है। आप अपने आप को उन मामलों से लड़ने के लिए तैयार होने के लिए पढ़ सकते हैं जो आपके पास हैं। यह आपके मामले के लिए और खुद को तैयार करने के लिए रणनीति बनाने में मदद करेगा।)



1.     MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated 4 Feb 2005

M aintenance not granted as it is proved that wife wants to reside separately.

 

2.     MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated Apr 2008.

M aintenance not granted as it is proved no reason to leave husbands.

 

3.     CHENNAI HIGH COURT : Dated 21 June 2002 M aintenance Denied

 

4.     CHENNAI HIGH COURT : Dated 21 Feb 2003 N o Maintenance For Working Women

 

5.     MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT : Dated 24 March 2000 No Interim/Maintenance for Capable, Working Women

 

6.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 28 July 2008 She was earning and she had not come to the Court with clean hands.

 

7.  MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 22 Feb 2008 Wife Troubled ­No Maintenance

 

8.  SUPREME COURT : Dated 23 March, 2009 SC Judgement on HMA24 ­ Wife working no maintenance

 

9.  HIGH COURT OF P & H Maintenance awarded in two sections to be offset

 

10.  HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD Old Parents, Maintenance reduced.

 

11.  MUMBAI HIGH COURT: Dated 22 February, 2008 Perjury in 125 crPc

 

12.  MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT: Madhuri Bai vs Minor Surendra Kumar And Anr. on 24 April, 1998 Child can claim maintenance u/s 125 from mother

 

13.  MADRAS HIGH COURT: S.Chandra vs C.V.Sridharan on 21 February 2007Claim alimony within 6 Months of Divorce

 

14.  DELHI HIGH COURT: Sanjay Bhardwaj & Ors. vs The State & Anr. on 27 August, 2010 Unemployed man can not be forced to pay Maintenance

 

15.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: Ines Miranda vs Santosh K Swamy dated 14 december 2010 TRANSFER PETITION – Payment to Husband


16.  MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated 17 July, 1991 Same relief (maintenance)cannot be asked twice in two different courts

 

17.  DELHI COURT : METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NEW DELHIVexatious petition, maintenance,relief is declined

 

18.  BOMBAY HIGH COURT : Dated 14 March 2011 Perjury Judgement : Rigorous imprisonment for False Case

 

19.  ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE (CENTRAL)TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI: Dated 15 April 2011 Maintenance claim based on Affidavit dismissed

 

20.  PUNJAB ­ HARYANA HIGH COURT: Dated 17 February 2011Maintenance claim based on Affidavit dismissed

 

21.  DELHI HIGH COURT Husband Property Not Counted in Maintenance

 

22.    HIGH COURT OF P & H : Dated 28 July 1961 Maintenance not based on Arthmetic Calculation

 

23.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 1 September, 2010 Claim of high status of husband not sufficient for interim maintenance

 

24.    DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 30 August, 2010 Multiple Maintenance petitions are not allowed

 

25.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 20 July, 2010 Reduced Intrim Maintenance

 

26.    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 11 June, 1993 No Maintenance

 

27.  MUMBAI HIGH COURT : Dated 18 July, 2009 No Maintenance to Wife if RCR By Husband Suicceed

 

28.  MUMBAI HIGH COURT Permanent Alimoney Cancelled.

 

29.  MUMBAI HIGH COURRT: Dated 2010 Income Tax and Maintenance

 

30.  MUMBAI HIGH COURRT: Dated 18 November 2010 Income tax returns cannt decide Maintenance

 

31.  MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT: Dated 29 August 1991 Challenging the rejected interim maintenance

 

32.  PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT: Dated 25 January, 2010 False affidavit, perjury procedure in 24 HMA

 

33.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 7 September 2006 Divorce withdrawn Maintance to be paid

 

34.  DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated 16 November 2004 Father In Law not responsible for Residence

 

35.  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT: Dated 22 September, 1992 Women to Prove ligitimacy of child for maintenance


36.  CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Bank Account Details and confidentiality

 

37.  BOMBAY HIGH COURT: Dated 15 September, 2004 Return of Stridhan,Alimony and Hidding Past

 

38.  GAUHATI HIGH COURT: Dated 23 April, 2004 Guardianship within 2 Months

 

39.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 9 March, 2010 Fine for Delaying tactics by Lawyer

 

40.  CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Central Information Commission ­ CIC Order in Passport Details

 

41.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 25 October, 2010 Petitioner must claim she is unable to maintain herself for relief of maintenance

 

42.  ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Dated 25 March, 1976 Petitioner must claim she is unable to maintain herself for relief of maintenance

 

43.  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated 13 February, 1980 She should prove that she is unable to maintain herself in addition to the facts that her husband has sufficient means to maintain her and that he has neglected to maintain her

 

44.  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated 22 August, 2005 No maintenance for earning wife

 

45.  DISTRICT COURT , SAKET, DELHI : Dated 18 Nov 2010 Employable wife not entitled to maintenance.

 

46.  DISTRICT COURT , SAKET, DELHI : Dated 24 March 2008 An NRI wins an interim maintenance case

 

47.  FAMILY COURT , HYDERABAD Hyderabad Family court, unclean hands, no maintenance

 

48.  DELHI HIGH COURT: Dated 17 April 2007 Conditions when maintenance to be paid

 

49.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 11 January, 2011 All State Amendments in Sec. 125 are invalid

 

50.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 17 February, 2006 Habeas Corpus for girl child custody to Father

 

51.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 28 April, 2005 Habeas Corpus dismissed in Custody Appeal

 

52.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 21 November, 2006 Custody to reMarried women

 

53.  MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 25 January, 2006 Habeas Corpus on Custody to Father

 

54.  MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 6 February, 2006 Habeas Corpus for Custody on Death

 

55.  KERALA HIGH COURT : Dated December, 2010 NBW cannot be issued for non payment of maintenance


 

56.  CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION CIC Income Tax Details of FIL are public

 

57.  UTTARANCHAl HIGH COURT : Dated 17 March, 2011 HC Quash Maintenance

 

58.  MUMBAI HIGH COURT :Dated 13 September, 1995 No multiple maintenance claims

 

59.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 9 October, 1985 Magistrate can grant interim maintenance ?

 

60.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 16 February, 2000 Habeas Corpus in Custody

 

61.  MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 27 March, 2007 Habeas Corpus in Divorce / Custody Petition

 

62.SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 17 October, 1974 Separate income of the wife can be taken into account in determining the amount of maintenance payable to her

 

63.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 31 January, 2003 HMA moveable property can not be termed as Income

 

64.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 18 September, 2008 Maintenance On Actual Earnings

 

65.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 30 September, 2008 Parents can kickout their Children

 

66.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 28 March, 2000 Liability of maintenance of children is co­extensive

 

67.  GUJRAT HIGH COURT : Dated on 21 October 2010 No Multiple maintenance

 

68.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 12 October, 2009 DV can be filed anywhere

 

69.  MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 28 October, 2010 Magistrate should not blindly call all family members as respondents

 

70.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 4 October, 2010 DVA only against who are in domestic relationship

 

71.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 20 September, 2010 How to decide domestic relationship in DVA

 

72.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 8 February, 2010 Frivolous petition claiming damages dismissed

 

73.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 7 January, 2010 Maintenance, Women fined, Contempt of Court

 

74.  ANDHRA HIGH COURT : Dated 15 November, 1995 Maintenance to illegitimate Child ?

 

75.  CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION RTI Husband can get Wife PF details

 

76.  ANDHRA HIGH COURT : Dated 31 March, 1989 Maintenance arrears for 1 year only !

 

77.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 6 December, 2005 Fine for forcibly taking away Child

 

78.  MADRAS HIGH COURT : Dated 28 February, 2007 Family Court Jurisdiction


79.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 2 March 2000 Wife is not entitled to maintenance who has deserted her husband,

 

80.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 03 December 2009 No Maintenance If Wife Lies

 

81.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 28 April 2009 Take EMI Into Cosideration in Maintenance

 

82.  HIGH COURT OF STATE OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH : Dated 13 March 2009 No alimony to Women who desert her husband

 

83.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 23 February, 2009 Interim maint increase illegal as no income proof produced

 

84.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 20 July, 2010 Interim maint amt shuld be based on status of both part

 

85.  CHATTISGARAH HIGH COURT : Dated 15 February, 2004 No maintenance for a deserting wife

 

86.  RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT: Dated 22 January, 1999 No maintenance for a deserting wife

 

87.  BOMBAY HIGH COURT : Dated 26 February, 2010 Interim maintenance cannot be increased based on husband's salary hike.

 

88.  GUJARAT HIGH COURT : Dated 9 February, 2011 Childrens has to maintain parents.

 

110. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 20 July 2011 Meaning of unable to maintain

 

89.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 27 November 2007 Unable to maintain herself in Maintenance

 

90.  DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE DELHI : Dated 28th August 2010Landmark Judgement for DV Case

 

91.  CHENNAI HIGH COURT : Dated 26th August 2010 Perjury Case

 

92.  ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Dated 19 January, 2010 Wife fined 10,000/­ in Perjury case but Husband fighting for further action!!

 

93.  DELHI HIGH COURT : Dated 18 August, 2010 Every allegations do not justify initiation of prosecution under 340 CRPC

 

94.  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT : Dated 15 March, 2001 Petition under CrPC 340 must be decided only at the end

 

95.  ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Dated 09 Janurary 2003 Perjury application must be decided first before proceeding with the case

 

96.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 14 November, 1994 No one should indulge in immoral acts like perjury, prevarication and motivated falsehoods : 2 weeks Jail


97.  GUJARAT HIGH COURT : Dated 18 August, 2010 Petitioner aggreed for perjury Gujrat HC told to deposit 25K as probable fine

 

98.  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : Dated 1 December, 2010 SC judgement in CrPC 340 wrt Chartered Accountants Act


This is very important to read the past cases which can be used as references .





Lets fight together,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Counter Cases Positioning in 498a

Y ou have been fabricated falsely in dowry cases in packages of 498a to ruin your life. Its a  strategy  to extort money only. It is advisable to read the FIR copy and make points where the opposite party is making mistakes. The irony is 90% of the writing in FIR is copy paste so there are chances that you will find a lot of loopholes that will backfire the opposite party, here opposite party is putting only allegations which are baseless so you have to attack on that. Keep patience and wait for the right time. Lets see the counter cases you can impose on the opposite party . CHAPTER XI: OF FALSE EVIDENCE AND OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE   191.       Giving false evidence   Whoever, being legally bound by an oath or by an express provision of law to state the truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe...

Imp Judgement - NO AUTOMATIC ARREST OF THE ACCUSED IN 498A IPC CASES

  NO AUTOMATIC ARREST OF THE ACCUSED IN 498A IPC CASES This relief given by Supreme Court.                                                                                   REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1277  OF 2014 (@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.9127 of 2013)   ARNESH KUMAR                            ..... APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.            .... RESPONDENTS   J U D G M E N T Chandramauli Kr. Prasad        The petitioner appr...

How to Cross fight CRPC125 : Effective argument

    Effective argument; points for the arguments:- a)       She has unreasonably left the house and has deserted the husband, therefore is not entitled for the maintenance:- Case laws on this point for support your argument:-                    I.             Rohtash Sigh vs Smt. Ramendri AIR 2000 SC 952.                 II.             SanjaySudhakarBhosale Versus Khristina w/o Sanjay Bhosale dated 8.4.2008.              III.             Uttaranchal High Court Smt. Archana Gupta & Another vs Sri Rajeev Gupta & Another on 18 November, 2009.  ...